The Value of Self-Awareness
All human beings have the
ability to be aware, not just of our breathing, but of a multitude of
things that make up who we are. Let us demonstrate what we mean.
Imagine, in your mind's eye, that a part of you can float out of your
body, floating up to a particular corner of the room, so that you can
see yourself, from that perspective.
What would it be like to do this? What would it feel like? How would you
describe the particular sensations that the you who is sitting there is
experiencing right now? Focus on a particular part of your body and
become aware of your experience there. Perhaps you can be aware of
pressure, or temperature, or some other sensation. It's not important
what the specific sensation is, just your ability to notice it. How
about your overall mood? How would you characterize that? What can you
say about your thoughts? Are you thinking about what you are reading
right now, and yet perhaps at the same time wondering what's the point
of all this? As you answer these questions, make sure you get back into
your body.
The Witnessing Stance
By doing what you just did, and answering the questions we just asked, you have demonstrated your ability for self-awareness.
All human beings share the ability to be aware of ourselves. The fact
that we can stand apart from our feelings and our thoughts suggests that
we can have some control over them. Ram Dass, formerly known as Richard
Alpert, a Harvard psychologist who studied extensively in India and is
renowned for integrating both Eastern and Western techniques, describes
our ability to stand apart from ourselves, to view ourselves from the
outside, as assuming the witnessing stance. Whenever you are involved in the many experiences that make up your life, you have the choice to be a witness
to your own life. This shift in perspective provides you with the
possibility that you can change the particular situation. The fact is
that you cannot always change situations (that is, external stressors or
events) you are faced with, but you can always change your reaction
toward the stressor. Assuming the witnessing stance allows you to make
this shift.
Remember that, as we
mentioned earlier, what inappropriately triggers your fight-or-flight
response, and therefore your stress, is not actual physical danger. Not
many of you have guns pointed at your head, at least not on a daily
basis. What triggers your stress response is your perception of danger.
And whether you perceive something as dangerous depends on the meaning
you give the particular situation. Human beings give meaning to
everything, and what we say, especially to ourselves, about a situation
or event determines our attitude toward it. Assuming an observer
perspective allows you to get a glimpse of the meaning you are ascribing
and therefore provides you an opportunity to change your attitude.
Attitude Is Everything!
Research has revealed
that the attitude you have at the beginning of a task determines the
outcome of that task more than any other single factor. For example, if
you believe you will be able to succeed at a particular undertaking and
you approach the endeavor with a sense of excitement and joyful
expectation, your chances of achieving success are much higher than if
you face the task with dread and apprehension. Self-fulfilling
prophecies can be positive or negative, depending on your expectations.
So your attitude is more important than any other possible factor, both
external and internal. We believe that it
is perhaps more accurate to say that everything is created three times.
First, you create your reality by your thoughts, including what you
think about the events that happen to you. Then you further give
substance to these thoughts by your words—for example, when you describe
the events in your life to others. Finally, your actions complete the
process of creation. This is clearly true when it comes to stress and
whether we thrive from it or are buried by it.
Remember Thomas Holmes
and his research showing that there was a relationship between the
number, severity, and pervasiveness of life changes and our physical and
emotional health? We mentioned that the major flaw of this series of
studies was a failure to take into account individual differences in
abilities to cope with the changes and demands. This research focused
only on the effects of external events or stressors.
Psychologist
Suzanne Kobasa decided to focus her research interests on individual
differences in coping skills. What makes some people capable of handling
enormous amounts of change and demands without suffering the
devastating physical and emotional consequences predicted by the Holmes
research? Kobasa studied individuals whose lives seemed so filled with
stressors that, according to Holmes, they should have been growing
massive tumors on the sides of their heads. Yet these folks were
successful in their endeavors and seemed to be suffering no apparent
negative consequences from their demanding lifestyle (Kobasa, 1984).
Stress Hardiness Attitudes
Kobasa discovered
three attitudes that these people all shared and that appeared to make
them resistant to the negative effects of stress. She called these three
attitudes stress hardiness attitudes
because individuals who possess them appear to be “stress-hardy,” that
is, capable of dealing effectively with stressors. These three attitudes
are control, commitment, and challenge. They are also referred to as the three C's
of stress hardiness (Kobasa, 1979).
Control
Let's take a look at the first attitude, control.
Stress-hardy individuals believe that they are in control of their
lives, rather than that stressors have control over them. They recognize
that they have resources and options that allow them to influence
events in their lives. Although stress-hardy individuals recognize that
they may not always have direct control over the actual onset or
occurrence of an event, they certainly have control over their own
response to the stressor. And this is not only true of humans, but also
true of such higher life forms as rats. For example, let's
hypothetically place two rats in cages capable of delivering an
electroshock to their unsuspecting paws. (Psychologists do, indeed, do
this and other perhaps less kindly things to these animals. That is why
our standing as a profession is rather low in the rat community!) Using
what is known in experimental psychology as a yoked research design,
both rats are then shocked simultaneously at various intervals. One rat
has a lever available in its cage that if pressed will discontinue the
shock. The second rat has no such escape opportunity. When the first rat
presses the lever, it stops the shock for both rats. This assures that
both rats are exposed to the same level and intensity of the shock, but
only the first rat has control over discontinuing the stressful event.
Can you guess what happens? The first rat, the one with control, is
minimally, if at all affected by the series of shocks. The second,
“helpless” rat, on the other hand, suffers negatively, developing
multiple psychosomatic symptoms such as ulcers.
These differences
in stress response are maintained even when the escape lever is removed
and replaced merely by a light that precedes the shock. In this design,
the first rat has no means of escape, but is warned that a shock is
imminent. Although the rat can do no more than dance around the cage,
the effects of the stressor are somehow reduced perhaps because the rat
knows it is going to be dancing around and is therefore more prepared to
do so. Thus, our sense of control is also affected by the extent to
which we can anticipate and prepare for the onset of stressors and
change. Involvement in exercise is a perfect example of this. We know
that physical exercise is stressful. Yet it is stress over which we have
control because we typically can choose when to begin and when to end
our exercise routine. Stress researchers conclude that this sense of
control is at least partially responsible for the beneficial effects of
repeated exercise.
Locus of Control
Stress-hardy
individuals refuse to see themselves as victims, buffeted and abused by
external occurrences over which they have no control. People with this
attitude see themselves as active players in their own lives. They
possess what Julian Rotter (1966) described as an internal locus of control.
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that they are
responsible for the ultimate outcomes in their life. They do not wait
for fate to lead them in directions; rather they endeavor to take active
control over their own life. When students with an internal locus of
control fail a test, they do not blame the teacher nor the test
questions. They take responsibility for the failure and attempt to
determine what action is needed to avoid this in the future. This is the
same attitude described by Stephen Covey as proactivity.
Proactivity, simply defined, refers to the fact that as human beings we
are responsible for our actions. What comes up for you when you hear
the word responsibility? Perhaps you imagine a heavy ball and chain shackled to your ankle, impeding your freedom. But Covey means that we have response-ability,
the ability to choose how to respond to any life situation. What about
you? Do you look toward solutions, things you can do? Or do you focus
primarily on the problem and how awful it is, and how things like that
shouldn't happen to you? Take some time now and truthfully answer these
questions. What would be your typical response?
What did you find? You
see, whether you believe you are in control is a critical factor in
predicting the outcomes of the various events in your life. There is no
question that life is filled with waves that each of us must navigate
during our personal journeys. You might not have the choice about when
these waves appear or their strength, but you can certainly choose how
you ride them—whether you travel on top of the water or underneath it;
whether you have sails or oars to help you direct your way, or are
merely carried away by the currents; and whether you enjoy the ride, in
awe of the variety and beauty of it all, or are gasping for air,
drowning in the tide.
Commitment
The second attitude characteristic of stress-hardy individuals that Kobasa identified is commitment.
It is not merely persistence in following through with a goal; it is an
attitude that expresses a real joie de vivre, a zest for life.
Commitment involves believing that what you do is of value and
importance. Individuals exhibiting this attitude seem to possess an
almost romantic relationship to their own life and the pursuits they
choose. When they wake up in the morning, they don't start their day
with, “Oh God, I wonder what could go wrong today? What horrible ambush
can life have planned for me?” Instead they wake up expectant of the
possible surprises and wonderful experiences that the day has in store
for them. They have an optimistic outlook. Stressors are viewed as
potentially interesting and meaningful. Commitment is the opposite of
alienation and is characterized by involvement.
It is not surprising that
research has linked how a person answers two simple questions with the
likelihood of developing heart disease. The two questions are: Are you
happy? Do you like your job? If you answer yes to both of these, your
chances of developing heart disease are much lower. Clearly the reverse
is true when the answer is no. We are not implying here that overall
life/job satisfaction causes heart disease; obviously there are many
other factors operating in the development of cardiovascular problems.
But your attitude toward your life is one important contributing factor.
What is your attitude when you first open your eyes in the morning? We
suggest you begin with an attitude of gratitude—one
that says, “Thank you. I'm glad I'm alive. I wonder what adventures and
experiences this day has for me.” You see, happiness is not a
condition, but a decision. You can choose to focus on all that can make
you miserable. If you do, you will get results fitting this attitude. Or
you can choose to count your blessings, to be thankful for all you
have, and all you still have coming. To quote the great comedian Gilda
Radner shortly before her untimely death, “Happiness is not about getting what you want, but about appreciating what you have.”
Challenge
The third and final attitude that Kobasa discovered to be typical of stress-hardy indi viduals is that of challenge. This attitude can perhaps be best explained by considering the concept of crisis. The Chinese write this word using two characters, as illustrated in Figure 1. The first character is the symbol for dangerous; the second is the symbol for opportunity. Think about that, what a wonderful way to describe a crisis. Not a catastrophe, or a problem, but a dangerous opportunity.
Individuals exhibiting the attitude of challenge focus not so much on
the danger aspect of the crisis, but on the opportunities available as a
result. Every crisis, no matter what, has inherent opportunities. Those
who cope well look for these opportunities and capitalize on them.
Those who cope poorly get paralyzed by the inherent danger. To again
quote Don Juan,
The basic difference
between a warrior and an ordinary man is that a warrior sees everything
as a challenge. While an ordinary man sees everything as either a
blessing or a curse. (Castaneda, 1998, p. 82)
Or, to quote another colorful literary character, Zorba from Zorba the Greek by Nikos Kazantzakis, “Life is trouble, only death is not. To be alive is to put on your pants and go looking for trouble.”
Stress Hardiness Inventory
Instructions:
Use the following scale to indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement:
0=Strongly disagree
| 1=Mildly disagree
|
2=Mildly agree
| 3=Strongly agree
|
____________
| A.
| Trying my best at work and school makes a difference.
|
____________
| B.
| Trusting to fate is sometimes all I can do in a relationship.
|
____________
| C.
| I often wake up eager to start on the day's projects.
|
____________
| D.
| Thinking of myself as a free person leads to great frustration and difficulty.
|
____________
| E.
| I would be willing to sacrifice financial security in my work if something really challenging came along.
|
____________
| F.
| It bothers me when I have to deviate from the routine or schedule I've set for myself.
|
____________
| G.
| An average citizen can have an impact on politics.
|
____________
| H.
| Without the right breaks, it is hard to be successful in my field.
|
____________
| I.
| I know why I am doing what I'm doing at work or school.
|
____________
| J.
| Getting close to people puts me at risk of being obligated to them.
|
____________
| K.
| Encountering new situations is an important priority in my life.
|
____________
| L.
| I really don't mind when I have nothing to do.
|
Scoring
To get your scores
for control, commitment, and challenge, write the number of your answer,
from 0 to 3, above the letter for each question. Then add and subtract
as shown.
If your score is 10 to 18, you have a hardy personality.
If your score is 0 to 9, you are moderately hardy.
If your score is below 0, you are not very hardy.
Hardiness and Stress Resistance
Take a moment to fill out
the Stress Hardiness Inventory. Research has documented an association
between high hardiness scores and lower rates of physical illness among
white-collar male executives and women in various occupations (Rhodewalt
& Zone, 1989), blue-collar workers (Manning, Williams, & Wolfe,
1988), college students (Roth et al., 1989), and adolescents (Sheppard
& Kashani, 1991). Hardiness is also associated with psychological
health. Stress-hardy individuals report lower anxiety levels, less
depression, greater job satisfaction, and lower levels of tension at
work. In other studies, hardy subjects were shown to have stronger
physical tolerance for stress. When exposed to a stressor they have a
lower increase in diastolic blood pressure (Contrada, 1989) and a
smaller increase in heart rate (Lawler & Schmied, 1987?).
One interesting
study (Allred & Smith, 1989) demonstrated that male college students
who scored low on hardiness experienced high levels of tension before
the onset of a stressor (that is, as they waited and anticipated), while
those scoring high on hardiness displayed higher arousal only during
exposure to the stressor. It appeared that the hardy subjects got
aroused only when they needed an adrenaline surge to confront the
stressor more effectively, while the others spent valuable energy
worrying. Hardy individuals do get physiologically aroused, but at the
right time and to the right level.
Strong resistance to
stress is associated with optimism, and clearly the ability to think
positively is a defining characteristic of the stress-hardy.
Stress-resistant people are more likely to use problem-focused coping
measures, positive thinking, and support-seeking strategies when faced
with stress (Cohen & Edwards, 1989; Holt, Fine, & Tollefson,
1987; Nowack, 1989). Those scoring low on measures of hardiness tend to
respond passively to stress, whether with avoidance or maladaptive
behaviors. Hardy individuals are much more likely to take care of their
health, which helps boost their stress resistance. A strong sense of
personal control over one's life is associated with better health
habits, such as exercise and good nutrition. Stress-hardy individuals
are far less likely to utilize maladaptive coping strategies such as
abusing alcohol, drugs or nicotine, or to act out aggressively when
under stress.
The Three C's in Action
In August 1992, we
had an opportunity to witness firsthand how stress hardiness attitudes
affected the ability of literally thousands of people to cope with a
monumental crisis. Being based in South Florida (specifically, the
southern portion of Miami) we, along with thousands of other people,
experienced Hurricane Andrew, one of the strongest storms ever to ravage
the mainland United States. The scale of property destruction and
disruption of normal life for months afterward was unprecedented. Just
about everyone in the hurricane zone (ourselves included) suffered
severe damage to their homes, businesses, cars, and personal property.
Rebuilding took years, and normal routines were totally disrupted for at
least six months for most people. As psychologists we paid close
attention to how individuals coped with the aftermath and we found that
three distinct styles emerged:
The Whiners—
individuals who spent weeks and months bemoaning their plight
and all the inconveniences, hassles, and property losses they suffered.
The Stiff-Upper-Lip Crowd—
individuals who were very upset but focused on cleaning up and
rebuilding and didn't spend an inordinate amount of time complaining.
But internally they focused primarily on how awful it all was.
The Adventurers—
individuals who did not deny the reality of the damage but who
focused on how interesting, how exciting, what an adventure it all was.
These people relished rebuilding their homes with insurance money. They
delighted in the sense of camaraderie and community that developed
between neighbors who found themselves in the same boat, and who
previously had barely spoken to one another.
Needless to say, the
latter group experienced far fewer emotional disturbances and physical
illnesses than the other two groups. They believed that they could
control their destiny, even in the face of incredible ruin. They were
committed to making the rebuilding process as joyful as possible. And
they viewed the crisis as a challenge and an opportunity to recreate
their living situation and make new friends. For them the hurricane
became an epic, fascinating story to share with friends, rather than
merely a tragic event.
Clearly, you should be able to perceive the wisdom in Stephen Covey's oft-quoted phrase, “The way you see the problem is the problem.”
Ultimately, whether something is stressful depends on the way you look
at the situation. Remember, it is not the world out there that makes you
a victim, it is your perception of the circumstances and events that
leads you either to be defeated by stress or to survive and thrive from
the challenges and opportunities presented to you. You may not have
control over all that happens to you, but you certainly always have
control over the meaning you give to the events in your life. There is
an old saying: “When God closes a door, he opens a window.”
Remember this as you face apparent hardships in your life. Always look
for the windows; we guarantee that they will be there, no matter what
the circumstances.